Paper detail

Comparing the inversion statistic for distribution-biased and distribution-shifted permutations with the geometric and the GEM distributions

For a distribution $p:=\{p_k\}_{k=1}^\infty$ on the positive integers, there are two natural ways to construct a random permutation in $S_n$ or of $\mathbb{N}$ from IID samples from $p$--the $p$-biased construction and the $p$-shifted construction. First we consider the case that $p$ is the geometric distribution with parameter $1-q\in(0,1)$. In this case, the $p$-shifted random permutation has the Mallows distribution with parameter $q$. Let $P_n^{b;\text{Geo}(1-q)}$ and $P_n^{s;\text{Geo}(1-q)}$denote the biased and the shifted distributions on $S_n$. The expected number of inversions of a permutation under $P_n^{s;\text{Geo}(1-q)}$ is greater than under $P_n^{b;\text{Geo}(1-q)}$, and under either of these, a permutation tends to have many fewer inversions than it would have under the uniform distribution. For fixed $n$, both $P_n^{b;\text{Geo}(1-q)}$ and $P_n^{s;\text{Geo}(1-q)}$ converge weakly as $q\to1$ to the uniform distribution on $S_n$. We compare the biased and the shifted distributions by studying the inversion statistic under $P_n^{b;\text{Geo}(q_n)}$ and $P_n^{s;\text{Geo}(q_n)}$ for various rates of convergence of $q_n$ to 1. Then we consider $p$-biased and $p$-shifted permutations in the case that the distribution $p$ is itself random and distributed as a GEM$(θ)$-distribution. In both the GEM$(θ)$-biased and the GEM$(θ)$-shifted cases, the expected number of inversions behaves asymptotically as it does under the Geo$(1-q)$-shifted distribution with $θ=\frac q{1-q}$. Thus, one can consider the GEM$(θ)$-shifted case as the random counterpart of the Geo$(q)$-shifted case. We also consider another $p$-biased distribution with random $p$ for which the expected number of inversions behaves asymptotically as it does under the Geo$(1-q)$-biased case with $θ$ and $q$ as above, and with $θ\to\infty$ and $q\to1$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.