Paper detail

Comparing optimized renormalization schemes for QCD observables

Based on the renormalization group summation method of McKeon ${\it et\; al.}$, it is shown that the renormalization group equation, while related to the radiatively mass scale $μ$, would perform a summation over QCD perturbative terms. Employing the full QCD $β$-function within this summation, all logarithmic corrections can be presented as log-independent contributions. In another step of this approach, the renormalization scheme dependence of QCD observables, characterized by Stevenson, is required to be examined. In this regard, two choices of renormalization scheme would be exposed. In one of them, the QCD observable is expressed in terms of two powers of running coupling constant. In the other one, the perturbative series expansion is written as an infinite series in terms of the two-loop running coupling represented by the Lambert $W$-function. In both cases, the QCD observable involves parameters which are renormalization scheme invariant and a coupling constant which is independent of the renormalization scale. We then consider the approach of complete renormalization group improvement (CORGI). In this approach, using the self consistency principle, it is possible to reconstruct the conventional perturbative series in terms of scheme invariant quantities and the coupling constant as a function of Lambert $W$-function. One of the key differences between CORGI and the renormalization group summation method of McKeon ${\it et\; al.}$ is that the later treats renormalization scale and scheme independently while the former would encounter both dependencies together. In continuation, numerical results of the two approaches are compared for $R_{e^+e^-}$ ratio and the Higgs decay width to gluon-gluon.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.