Paper detail

Comparing change-point locations of independent profiles with application to gene annotation

We are interested in the comparison of transcript boundaries from cells which originated in different environments. The goal is to assess whether this phenomenon, called differential splicing, is used to modify the transcription of the genome in response to stress factors. We address this question by comparing the change-points locations in the individual segmentation of each profile, which correspond to the RNA-Seq data for a gene in one growth condition. This requires the ability to evaluate the uncertainty of the change-point positions, and the work of Rigaill et. al. (2011) provides an appropriate framework in such case. Building on their approach, we propose two methods for the comparison of change-points, and illustrate our results on a dataset from the yeast specie. We show that the UTR boundaries are subject to differential splicing, while the intron boundaries are conserved in all profiles. Our approach is implemented in an R package called EBS which is available on the CRAN.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.