Paper detail

Comparing air quality statistical models

Air pollution is a great concern because of its impact on human health and on the environment. Statistical models play an important role in improving knowledge of this complex spatio-temporal phenomenon and in supporting public agencies and policy makers. We focus on the class of hierarchical models that provides a flexible framework for incorporating spatio-temporal interactions at different hierarchical levels. The challenge is to choose a model that is satisfactory in terms of goodness of fit, interpretability, parsimoniousness, prediction capability and computational costs. In order to support this choice, we propose a comparison approach based on a set of criteria summarized in a table that can be easily communicated to non-statisticians. Our proposal - simple in principle but articulated in practice - holds true for many environmental phenomena where a hierarchical structure is suitable, a large-scale trend is included and a spatio-temporal covariance function has to be chosen. We illustrate the details of our proposal through a case study concerning particulate matter concentrations in Piemonte region (Italy) during the cold season October 2005-March 2006. From the evaluation of the proposed criteria for our case study we draw some conclusions. First, a model with a complex hierarchical structure is globally preferable to one with a complex spatio-temporal covariance function. Moreover, in the absence of suitable computational resources, a model simple in structure and with a simple covariance function can be chosen, since it shows good prediction performance at reasonable computational costs.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.