Paper detail

Comparative Study of Structural and Electronic Properties of Cu-based Multinary Semiconductors

We present a systematic and comparative study of the structural and electronic properties of Cu-based ternary and quaternary semiconductors using first-principles electronic structure approaches. The important role that Cu d electrons play in determining their properties is illustrated by comparing results calculated with different exchange correlation energy functionals. We show that systematic improvement of the calculated anion displacement can be achieved by using the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) functional compared with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional. Quasiparticle band structures are then calculated within the G0W0 approximation using the crystal structures optimized within the HSE06 functional and starting from the PBE+U mean-field solution. Both the calculated quasiparticle band gaps and their systematic variation with chemical constituents agree very well with experiments. We also predict that the quasiparticle band gaps of the prototypical semiconductor Cu2ZnSnS4 in the kesterite (KS) phase is 1.65 eV and that of the stannite (ST) phase is 1.40 eV. These results are also consistent with available experimental values which vary from 1.45 to 1.6 eV.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.