Paper detail

Comparative study of multipactor effect in rectangular and parallel-plate waveguides partially loaded with dielectric

In this work, a comparative study of the susceptibility chart in a partially dielectric-loaded rectangular waveguide and in its equivalent partially dielectric-loaded parallel-plate waveguide with the same height is performed. This study shows how the inhomogeneity of the electric field inside the rectangular waveguide modifies the edges of the multipactor susceptibility chart with respect to that predicted by the parallel-plate waveguide case. Moreover, comparisons of the evolution of the population and the trajectory of the effective electron and the DC field appearing in the waveguide in a point well inside the multipactor region obtained with both models are performed, showing some quantitative differences in the multipactor evolution, but a similar qualitative behaviour is observed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.