Paper detail

Comparative study of discrete Boltzmann model and Navier-Stokes

Discrete Boltzmann model (DBM) is a type of coarse-grained mesoscale kinetic model derived from the Boltzmann equation. Physically, it is roughly equivalent to a hydrodynamic model supplemented by a coarse-grained model for the relevant thermodynamic non-equilibrium (TNE) behaviours. The Navier-Stokes (NS) model is a traditional macroscopic hydrodynamic model based on continuity hypothesis and conservation laws. In this study, the two models are compared from two aspects, physical capability and computational cost, by simulating two kinds of flow problems including the thermal Couette flow and a Mach 3 step problem. In the cases where the TNE effects are weak, both the two models give accurate results for the hydrodynamic behaviour. Besides, DBM can provide more detailed non-equilibrium information, while the NS is more efficient if concern only the density, momentum, energy and their derived quantities. It is concluded that, if the TNE effects are strong or are to be investigated, the NS is insufficient while DBM is a good choice. While in the cases where the TNE effects are weak and only the macro flow fields are to be studied, the NS is more preferable.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.