Paper detail

Comparative Studies of 2HDMs under the Higgs Boson Precision Measurements

We perform comparative studies for four types of the two Higgs Doublet Models (2HDMs) under the precision measurements of the Standard Model (SM) Higgs observables at the proposed Higgs factories. We explore the discovery potential based on the hypothetical deviations in the precision data for the 2HDMs up to one-loop level. We find $5σ$ observability from the $χ^2$ fitting in a significant theory parameter space at future Higgs factories. For the Type-I 2HDM, regions with $\cos(β-α)\lesssim -0.1$ or $\cos(β-α)\gtrsim 0.08$ are discoverable at more than $5σ$ level. For the other three types of 2HDMs, the $5σ$ region is even bigger: $|\cos(β-α)|\gtrsim 0.02$ for $\tanβ\sim 1$. At small and large values of $\tanβ$, the region in $\cos(β-α)$ is further tightened. We examine the extent to which the different 2HDM theories may be distinguishable from one to the other at the $95\%$ Confidence Level with four benchmark points as case studies. We show that a large part of the parameter space of the other types of 2HDMs can be distinguished from the benchmark points of the target model. The impacts of loop corrections are found to be significant in certain parameter regions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.