Paper detail

Comparative Spectral Analysis of the Superluminous Supernova 2019neq

We present a detailed spectroscopic analysis of the recently discovered fast evolving Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN-I), SN 2019neq (at redshift z = 0.1059) comparing it to the well-studied slow evolving SLSN-I, SN 2010kd (z = 0.101). Our investigation concentrates on optical spectra taken during the photospheric phase. The observations of SN 2019neq were carried out with the 10m Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) Low Resolution Spectrograph-2 (LRS2) at McDonald Observatory. We apply the SYN++ code to model the spectra taken at -4 days, +5 days and +29 days from maximum light. We examine the chemical evolution and ejecta composition of the SLSN by identifying the elements and ionization states in its spectra. Our analysis confirms that SN 2019neq is a fast evolving SLSN-I. We derive the number density of each ionization state at the epoch of the three observations. Finally, we give constraints on the lower limit of the ejecta mass and find a hint for a possible relation between the evolution timescale and the ejected mass of SLSNe-I.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.