Paper detail

Comparative intra-night optical variability of X-ray and $γ$-ray detected narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies

In a systematic program to characterise the intra-night optical variability (INOV) of different classes of narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies (NLSy1s), we report here the first comparative INOV study of NLSy1 sets detected in the X-ray and $γ$-ray bands. Our sample consists of 18 sources detected in X-ray but not in $γ$-rays (hereafter x$\textunderscore$NLSy1s) and 7 sources detected in $γ$-rays (hereafter g$\textunderscore$NLSy1s), out of which 5 are detected also in X-rays. We have monitored these two sets of NLSy1s, respectively, in 24 and 21 sessions of a minimum of 3 hours duration each. The INOV duty cycles for these two sets are found to be 12\% and 53\%, respectively (at a 99\% confidence level). In the set of 18 x$\textunderscore$NLSy1s, INOV duty cycle is found to be zero for the 13 radio-quiet members (monitored in 14 sessions) and 43\% for the 5 radio-loud members (10 sessions). The latter is very similar to the aforementioned duty cycle of 53\% found here for the set of g$\textunderscore$NLSy1s (all of which are radio-loud). Thus it appears that the radio loudness level is the prime factor behind the INOV detection and the pattern of the high-energy radiation plays only a minor role.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.