Paper detail

Companion Shocking Fits to the 2018 ZTF Sample of SNe Ia Are Consistent with Single-Degenerate Progenitor Systems

The early lightcurves of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) can be used to test predictions about their progenitor systems. If the progenitor system consists of a single white dwarf in a binary with a Roche-lobe-overflowing non-degenerate stellar companion, then the SN ejecta should collide with that companion soon after the explosion and get shock-heated, leaving an early UV excess in the lightcurve. This excess would only be observable for events with favorable viewing angles, $\sim$10\% of the time. We model the 2018 ZTF sample of 127 SNe Ia using companion shocking models, and recover an observed early excess rate of $12.0\pm3.6\%$, consistent both with several other rates calculated throughout the literature, and with the expectation that SNe Ia predominantly occur in single-degenerate systems. We observe early excesses only in spectroscopically normal SNe Ia, in contradiction to the claim that such excesses occur more frequently in overluminous SNe Ia. We also show that the detection of early excesses can be methodology-dependent. We encourage the observation of large samples of SNe Ia with high-cadence multiwavelength early data in order to test the statistical predictions of SN Ia progenitor models, and we also encourage the refinement of existing models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.