Paper detail

Compact binaries detection rates from gravitational wave interferometers: comparison of different procedures

In this paper we perform a detailed analysis of the effect of various approximations which have been used in the literature to compute the detection rates of compact binary coalescences for interferometric gravitational wave detectors. We evaluate the detection rates for the coalescence of BH-BH, NS-NS, and BH-NS binaries taking into account their specific statistical properties obtained from population synthesis models, the cosmic star formation rate history, and the effects of redshift on the emitted gravitational wave signals. The results are compared with those obtained with procedures that are based on different levels of approximations, such as adopting averaged values for the total mass and symmetric mass ratio for all the systems of a binary population, using these to compute the horizon distance for individual detectors, or estimating the coalescence rate density within this distance by its local value. We show that these approximations introduce a bias which depends not only on the approximation which is used, but also on the statistical properties of the considered binary population.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.