Paper detail

Communication-Optimal Tilings for Projective Nested Loops with Arbitrary Bounds

Reducing communication - either between levels of a memory hierarchy or between processors over a network - is a key component of performance optimization (in both time and energy) for many problems, including dense linear algebra, particle interactions, and machine learning. For these problems, which can be represented as nested-loop computations, previous tiling based approaches have been used to find both lower bounds on the communication required to execute them and optimal rearrangements, or blockings, to attain such lower bounds. However, such general approaches have typically assumed the problem sizes are large, an assumption that is often not met in practice. For instance, the classical $(\text{# arithmetic operations})/(\text{cache size})^{1/2}$ lower bound for matrix multiplication is not tight for matrix-vector multiplications, which must read in at least $O(\text{# arithmetic operations})$ words of memory; similar issues occur for almost all convolutions in machine learning applications, which use extremely small filter sizes (and therefore, loop bounds). In this paper, we provide an efficient way to both find and obtain, via an appropriate, efficiently constructible blocking, communication lower bounds and matching tilings which attain these lower bounds for nested loop programs with arbitrary loop bounds that operate on multidimensional arrays in the projective case, where the array indices are subsets of the loop indices. Our approach works on all such problems, regardless of dimensionality, size, memory access patterns, or number of arrays, and directly applies to (among other examples) matrix multiplication and similar dense linear algebra operations, tensor contractions, n-body pairwise interactions, pointwise convolutions, and fully connected layers.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.