Paper detail

Communication Cost of Two-Database Symmetric Private Information Retrieval: A Conditional Disclosure of Multiple Secrets Perspective

We consider the total (upload plus download) communication cost of two-database symmetric private information retrieval (SPIR) through its relationship to conditional disclosure of secrets (CDS). In SPIR, a user wishes to retrieve a message out of $K$ messages from $N$ non-colluding and replicated databases without learning anything beyond the retrieved message, while no individual database learns the retrieved message index. In CDS, two parties each holding an individual input and sharing a common secret wish to disclose this secret to an external party in an efficient manner if and only if their inputs satisfy a public deterministic function. As a natural extension of CDS, we introduce conditional disclosure of multiple secrets (CDMS) where two parties share multiple i.i.d.~common secrets rather than a single common secret as in CDS. We show that a special configuration of CDMS is equivalent to two-database SPIR. Inspired by this equivalence, we design download cost efficient SPIR schemes using bipartite graph representation of CDS and CDMS, and determine the exact minimum total communication cost of $N=2$ database SPIR for $K=3$ messages.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.