Paper detail

Common Reconstructions in the Successive Refinement Problem with Receiver Side Information

We study a variant of the successive refinement problem with receiver side information where the receivers require identical reconstructions. We present general inner and outer bounds for the rate region for this variant and present a single-letter characterization of the admissible rate region for several classes of the joint distribution of the source and the side information. The characterization indicates that the side information can be fully used to reduce the communication rates via binning; however, the reconstruction functions can depend only on the Gács-Körner common randomness shared by the two receivers. Unlike existing (inner and outer) bounds to the rate region of the general successive refinement problem, the characterization of the admissible rate region derived for several settings of the variant studied requires only one auxiliary random variable. Using the derived characterization, we establish that the admissible rate region is not continuous in the underlying source source distribution even though the problem formulation does not involve zero-error or functional reconstruction constraints.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.