Paper detail

Common patterns between dengue cases, climate, and local environmental variables in Costa Rica: A Wavelet Approach

Throughout history, prevention and control of dengue transmission have challenged public health authorities worldwide. In the last decades, the interaction of multiple factors, such as environmental and climate variability, has influenced increments in incidence and geographical spread of the virus. In Costa Rica, a country characterized by multiple microclimates separated by short distances, dengue has been endemic since its introduction in 1993. Understanding the role of climatic and environmental factors in the seasonal and inter-annual variability of disease spread is essential to develop effective surveillance and control efforts. In this study, we conducted a wavelet time series analysis of weekly climate, local environmental variables, and dengue cases (2001-2019) from 32 cantons in Costa Rica to identify significant periods (e.g., annual, biannual) in which climate and environmental variables co-varied with dengue cases. Wavelet coherence analysis was used to characterize seasonality, multi-year outbreaks, and relative delays between the time series. Results show that dengue outbreaks occurring every 3 years in cantons located in the country's Central, North, and South Pacific regions were highly coherent with the Oceanic Niño 3.4 and the Tropical North Caribbean Index (TNA). Dengue cases were in phase with El Niño 3.4 and TNA, with El Niño 3.4 ahead of dengue cases by roughly nine months and TNA ahead by less than three months. Annual dengue outbreaks were coherent with local environmental variables (NDWI, EVI, Evapotranspiration, and Precipitation) in most cantons except those located in the Central, South Pacific, and South Caribbean regions of the country. The local environmental variables were in phase with dengue cases and were ahead by around three months.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.