Paper detail

Common envelope: on the mass and the fate of the remnant

One of the most important and uncertain stages in the binary evolution is the common envelope (CE) event. Significant attention has been devoted in the literature so far to the energy balance during the CE event, expected to determine the outcome. However this question is intrinsically coupled with the problem of what is left from the donor star after the CE and its immediate evolution. In this paper we argue that an important stage has been overlooked: post-CE remnant thermal readjustment phase. We propose a methodology for unambiguously defining the post-CE remnant mass after it has been thermally readjusted, namely by calling the core boundary the radius in the hydrogen shell corresponding to the local maximum of the sonic velocity. We argue that the important consequences of the thermal readjustment phase are: (i) a change in the energy budget requirement for the CE binaries and (ii) a companion spin-up and chemical enrichment, as a result of the mass transfer that occurs during the remnant thermal readjustment (TR). More CE binaries are expected to merge. If the companion is a neutron star, it will be mildly recycled during the TR phase. The mass transfer during the TR phase is much stronger than the accretion rate during the common envelope, and therefore satisfies the condition for a hypercritical accretion better. We also argue that the TR phase is responsible for a production of mildly recycled pulsars in double neutron stars.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.