Paper detail

Common-envelope Dynamics of a Stellar-mass Black Hole: General Relativistic Simulations

With the goal of providing more accurate and realistic estimates of the secular behavior of the mass accretion and drag rates in the "common-envelope" scenario encountered when a black hole or a neutron star moves in the stellar envelope of a red supergiant star, we have carried out the first general relativistic simulations of the accretion flow onto a nonrotating black hole moving supersonically in a medium with regular but different density gradients. The simulations reveal that the supersonic motion always rapidly reaches a stationary state and it produces a shock cone in the downstream part of the flow. In the absence of density gradients we recover the phenomenology already observed in the well-known Bondi--Hoyle--Lyttleton accretion problem, with super-Eddington mass accretion rate and a shock cone whose axis is stably aligned with the direction of motion. However, as the density gradient is made stronger, the accretion rate also increases and the shock cone is progressively and stably dragged toward the direction of motion. With sufficiently large gradients, the shock-cone axis can become orthogonal to the direction, or even move in the upstream region of the flow in the case of the largest density gradient. Together with the phenomenological aspects of the accretion flow, we have also quantified the rates of accretion of mass and momentum onto the black hole. Simple analytic expressions have been found for the rates of accretion of mass, momentum, drag force, and bremsstrahlung luminosity, all of which have been employed in the astrophysical modelling of the secular evolution of a binary system experiencing a common-envelope evolution...

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.