Paper detail

Committee ranking

This paper deals with interactions between committee members as they rank a large list of applicants for a given position and eventually reach consensus. We will see that for a natural deterministic model the ranking can be described by solutions of a discrete quasilinear heat equation with time dependent coefficients on a graph. We show first that over time consensus emerges exponentially fast. Second, if there are clusters of members whose views are closer than those of the rest of the committee, then over time the clusters' views become closer at a faster exponential rate than the views of the entire committee. We will also show that the variance of the rankings decays a definite amount, independent of the initial variance, when the influence of the members does not decay too quickly as opinions differ. When the influence between members is exactly a negative power, then the variance is convex and satisfies a three circles theorem.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.