Paper detail

Comments to a series of works by V.K. Mukhomorov on the theory of a continuum polaron and two-center bipolaron (axially symmetrical quasimolecular dimer)

Some critical remarks are made regarding a series of works by V.K. Mukhomorov dealing with polarons and oscillatory and rotational spectrum of a large-radius bipolaron near a subsidiary minimum corresponding to its two-center configuration. It is shown that V.K. Mukhomorov's conclusion that by varying the bipolaron functional one should look for a constrained rather than absolute minimum is erroneous. Consideration of interelectronic correlations corresponding to a direct dependence of the wave function of the studied system on the distance between the electrons does not break the virial theorem. In the strong coupling limit the virial theorem holds true for both one-center and two-center bipolaron states, the latter representing a subsidiary minimum which arises due to a choice of an insufficiently versatile variation function.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.