Paper detail

Comments on `Irreversibility in Response to Forces Acting on Graphene Sheets'

In the letter &#34;Phys. Rev. Lett 104, 196804 (2010)&#34; the compression-relaxation mechanism (CRM) for a graphene sheet (GS) was reported to be irreversible and resulted in static ripples on GS, such that for T <Tc the free-energy of the rippled GS is smaller than that of roughened GS. We will point out several technical difficulties, such as the use of the relation Delta A=<W> for the free energy calculations and the definition of the rough state, with their simulations. We show that (at T <Tc) their introduced rough state suffer boundary stress, thus is a rippled state and their obtained inequality A_{ripple}<A_{rough} is no longer valid. Therefore the introduced mechanism is reversible. Furthermore, from theoretical point of view for an infinitely slow rate of CRM, the relation Delta A=<W> (in common non-equilibrium simulations) is allowed. In this case authors of Ref. [1] must report the used infinitely small rate and justify how it is in practice valid. We show Delta A <> <W> for the system that was used in [1].

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.