Paper detail

Comments on "Numerical Stability of Detonations in White Dwarf Simulations"

Katz & Zingale (2019, KZ19) recently studied a one-dimensional test problem, intended to mimic the process of detonation ignition in head-on collisions of two carbon--oxygen (CO) white dwarfs. They do not obtain ignition of a detonation in pure CO compositions unless the temperature is artificially increased or 5% He is included. In both of these cases they obtain converged ignition only for spatial resolutions better than 0.1 km, which are beyond the capability of multidimensional simulations. This is in a contradiction with the claims of Kushnir et al. (2013, K13), that a convergence to $\sim10\%$ is achieved for a resolution of a few km. Using Eulerian and Lagrangian codes we show that a converged and resolved ignition is obtained for pure CO in this test problem without the need for He or increasing the temperature. The two codes agree to within 1% and convergence is obtained at resolutions of several km. We calculate the case that includes He and obtain a similar slow convergence, but find that it is due to a boundary numerical artifact that can (and should) be avoided. Correcting the boundary conditions allows convergence with resolution of $\sim10\,\textrm{km}$ in an agreement with the claims of K13. It is likely that the slow convergence obtained by KZ19 in this case is because of a similar boundary numerical artifact, but we are unable to verify this. KZ19 further recommended to avoid the use of the burning limiter introduced by K13. We show that their recommendation is not justified.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.