Paper detail

Commentary on Bayesian coincidence assessment (cross-matching)

This paper is an invited commentary on Tamas Budavari's presentation, "On statistical cross-identification in astronomy," for the Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy V conference held at Pennsylvania State University in June 2011. I begin with a brief review of previous work on probabilistic (Bayesian) assessment of directional and spatio-temporal coincidences in astronomy (e.g., cross-matching or cross-identification of objects across multiple catalogs). Then I discuss an open issue in the recent innovative work of Budavari and his colleagues on large-scale probabilistic cross-identification: how to assign prior probabilities that play an important role in the analysis. With a simple toy problem, I show how Bayesian multilevel modeling (hierarchical Bayes) provides a principled framework that justifies and generalizes pragmatic rules of thumb that have been successfully used by Budavari's team to assign priors.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.