Paper detail

Comment on the paper by L. Guzzo "Is the Universe homogeneous ?"

This comment is in response to the paper by L. Guzzo recently appeared in ``New Astronomy'' related to our work. The subject of the discussion concerns the correlation properties of galaxy distribution in the available 3-d samples. There is a general agreement that galaxy structures exhibit fractal properties, at least up to some scale. However the presence of an eventual crossover towards homogenization, as well as the exact value of the fractal dimension, are still matter of debate. Here we briefly summarize our point of view by discussing three main topics. The first one is methodological, i.e. we clarify which are the correct methods to detect the real correlations properties of the 3-d galaxy distribution. Then we discuss the results of the analysis of several samples in two ranges of scales. In the first range of scale, below $100 ÷200 \hmp$, the statistical quality of the data is rather good, and we find that galaxy distribution has fractal properties with $D \approx2$. At larger distances the statistical robustness of the present data is weaker, but, we show that there is evidence for a continuation of the fractal behavior, without any tendency towards homogenization.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.