Paper detail

Comment on Perez et al [PRX 2, 041005 (2012), arXiv:1209.2011]

Recently Perez et al [arXiv:1209.2011] wrote on the spectral slope of MHD turbulence claiming that it is consistent with -3/2. This work contains a number of errors, factual inaccuracies and puzzling methods in the interpretation of numerics. We argue that the numerical evidence that the authors presented is actually against -3/2 slope and the assumption of universal alignment, opposite to what they claim. Perhaps the most puzzling is the Fig.8 that claims that the authors measured the inertial range length and that it is consistent with Re^2/3 scaling. At a close inspection it appears that the datapoints are not the result of a measurement, but rather were calculated by a formula.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.