Paper detail

Comment on Hartree Fock Roothaan Calculations for Ground States of Some Atoms Using Minimal Basis Sets of Integer and Noninteger n STOs

Recently published formulas for the one-center integrals arising in atomic Hartree-Fock-Roothaan (HFR) calculations with noninteger n STOs (S.Gumus, T. Ozdogan, Chin. J. Chem., 22 (2004) 1262) are critically analyzed. The purpose of this note is to point out that the presented in these work relations for the integer n -nuclear attraction and kinetic energy integrals which are available in the literature (C.C.J. Roothaan, J. Chem. Phys., 19 (1951) 1445) can not be used for noninteger STOs. In addition, the formulas for two-electron integrals can be obtained from the published in the literature (T. Koga, K. Kanayama, Chem.Phys.Let., 266(1997)123; I.I. Guseinov, B.A. Mamedov, Theor. Chem. Acc.,108 (2002) 21) relations by changing the indices. It should be noted that the accuracy of computer values for ground states energy of some closed and open shell atoms in the case of noninteger n STOs is not guaranteed since the calculations were performed by the use of integer n -one electron integrals. It is argued that the paper sheds no new light on the subject and that it is altogether misleading.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.