Paper detail

Comment on arXiv:1301.3829 and Reply to 'Comment on "Can disorder really enhance superconductivity?"' arXiv:1501.05148 by I.M. Suslov

In arXiv:1301.3829 and arXiv:1501.05148 I. M. Suslov proposes a theoretical description for the interplay between disorder and superconductivity that, among other things, claims to predict situations where superconductivity is enhanced by disorder. In this comment we show that Suslov's results do not make any sound predictions relating to this problem. Suslov also suggests that the percolation approach recently employed by the authors to compute the global critical temperature of inhomogeneous superconductors induced by weak multifractality is not satisfactory. We refute Suslov's opinion using simple ideas from the Bardeen-Cooper-Schiaffer (BCS) theory of superconductivity. More importantly we stress that our theory makes quantitative analytical predictions for observables such as the global critical temperature and the spatial distribution of the order parameter. Our work can therefore be easily confirmed or disproved through either numerical or experimental study.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.