Paper detail

Comment on "Uncovering the Complex Behavior of Hydrogen in Cu2O"

In a recent Letter Scanlon and Watson reported their first principles results on hydrogen in Cu2O. Their main conclusions are: (1) an interstitial H in Cu2O prefers to occupy the tetrahedral site, which is coordinated with four Cu cations, in all three charge states (+1, neutral, and -1); (2) H will bind with a Cu vacancy and form an electrically active H-VCu defect complex, which is amphoteric with (+/0) and (0/-)transition levels at Ev + 0.1 and Ev + 1.1 eV, respectively. However, these two conclusions contradict two generally observed behaviors of H in oxides: (i) cationic H usually binds with an O atom, forming a single O-H bond, while the anionic H usually binds with cations with multi-coordination; (ii) H usually passivates cation vacancies in oxides. In this Comment, we explicitly show that with charge state +1, H prefers to bind with a single O anion rather than with four Cu cations and that H-VCu does not induce any defect levels inside the band gap.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.