Paper detail

Comment on "Tip induced unconventional superconductivity on Weyl semimetal TaAs" [arXiv:1607.00513]

Recently, Wang $et$ $al.$ have reported the observation of "unconventional superconductivity" in the Weyl semimetal TaAs [arXiv:1607.00513]. The authors have written "\textit{A conductance plateau and sharp double dips are observed in the point contact spectra, indicating p-wave like unconventional superconductivity. Furthermore, the zero bias conductance peak in low temperature regime is detected, suggesting potentially the existence of Majorana zero modes. The experimentally observed tunneling spectra can be interpreted with a novel mirror-symmetry protected topological superconductor induced in TaAs, which can exhibit zero bias and double finite bias peaks, and double conductance dips in the measurements}." In this comment we show that for a superconducting point contact, the features like a zero-bias conductance peak, a plateau and single or multiple conductance dips might arise due to simple contact-heating related effects. Such features are routinely observed in point contacts involving a wide variety of superconductors when the experiments are not performed in the right regime of mesoscopic transport. We also show that the data presented by Wang $et$ $al.$ in a single transport regime of point contact do not confirm tip induced superconductivity (TISC). Even if it is assumed that Wang $et$ $al.$ achieved TISC on TaAs, all the spectra that they have reported show striking similarities with the type of spectra expected in thermal regime of transport. Such data cannot be used for extracting any spectroscopic information and based on such data any discussion on "p-wave" superconductivity or the emergence of Majorana modes should be considered invalid. This version (v2) also includes a brief discussion on the response of Wang $et$ $al.$ to the first version (v1) of this comment. Correct ballistic regime data on TaAs point contacts can be found in arXiv:1607.05131 (2016).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.