Paper detail

Comment on "Superconducting phases in the presence of Coulomb interaction: From weak to strong correlations''

We examine the paper basic equations of T. Domański and K.I. Wysokiński [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 59}, 173 (1999)], who calculated the critical superconducting temperature, T_c, in function of Coulomb correlations (U) for s- and d-wave order parameter symmetries. We give physical arguments, based on general theory of perturbation, that in their gap equation the Coulomb repulsion is counted twice. Because of that, we write down the right mean-field gap equation and solve it by using a normal state one-particle Green function which gives a Mott metal-insulator transition for $T > T_c$ and which is valid for any value of U. In consequence, we are not allowed to use mean-field theory for both U and pairing (V). Our numerical results for T_c vs U shows that U is detrimental to superconductivity which agrees with the numerical results of Domański and Wysokiński. Our results can be extended to any value of the pairing interaction if superconducting pairing fluctuations are taken into account.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.