Paper detail

Comment on "Self-Consistent-Field Method for Correlated Many-Electron Systems with an Entropic Cumulant Energy"

In [Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 013001 (2022)] a novel ground state method was proposed. It has been suggested that this $i$-DMFT would be a method within one-particle reduced density matrix functional theory (DMFT), capable of describing accurately molecules at various geometries with an information-theoretical nature. We reassess this work and its suggestions from a conceptual and practical point of view, leading to the following conclusions: i) A method which assigns to each molecule $\mathcal{M}$ its own functional $\mathcal{F}_{\!\mathcal{M}}$ is not a functional theory (striking violation of "universality") ii) even for the simplest systems $i$-DMFT yields incorrect one-particle reduced density matrices and iii) the use of an information-theoretical concept to describe molecular dissociation limits was not essential. The latter insight may help to fix the deficiency of $i$-DMFT to not reproduce correctly the smaller occupation numbers and thus to not recover the important dynamic correlations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.