Paper detail

Comment on "Quantum transport with electronic relaxation in electrodes: Landauer-type formulas derived from the driven Liouville-von Neumann approach" [The Journal of Chemical Physics 153, 044103 (2020)]

In a recent article, Chiang and Hsu [The Journal of Chemical Physics 153, 044103 (2020)] examine one and two site electronic junctions identically connected to finite reservoirs. For these two examples, they derive analytical solutions, as well as provide asymptotic analyses, for the steady-state current from the driven Liouville-von Neumann (DLvN) equation - an open system approach to transport in non-interacting systems where relaxation maintains a bias. The two site junction they examine has destructive interference, which they show leads to slow convergence of the DLvN to the Landauer limit with respect to reservoir size and relaxation. We previously derived the general solution for the steady-state current in both the DLvN and its many-body analog [Gruss et al., Scientific Reports 6, 24514 (2016)]. The many-body analog is a Lindblad master equation, which, when restricted to non-interacting systems, is exactly the DLvN. Here, we demonstrate that applying the more general expression to identical left and right reservoirs (i.e., finite reservoirs with the same density of states and coupling to the system) and Markovian relaxation provides a simple analytic form that applies to arbitrary, but identically connected, junctions. Moreover, we briefly discuss the convergence of the current to the Landauer and Meir-Wingreen result for non-interacting and interacting systems, respectively. Convergence occurs as the reservoirs' lesser Green's functions begin conforming to the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. Our approach sheds light on the behavior Chiang and Hsu observe for destructive interference. Finally, we show that the analytical results yield the asymptotic formulas derived in Gruss et al.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.