Paper detail

Comment on "Precision global measurements of London penetration depth in FeTe$_{0.58}$Se$_{0.42}$"

Cho et al. [Phys. Rev. B, 84, 174502 (2011)] have reported on the temperature dependence of the London penetration depth deduced from Tunnel Diode Oscillator (TDO) measurements in optimally doped Fe(Se,Te) single crystals. According to their analysis, these measurements chould suggest a nodeless two-gap pairing symmetry with strong pair breaking effects. However, to reach this conclusion, the authors fit the temperature dependence of the superfluid density with a two band {\it clean} limit model which is incompatible with the presence of strong pair breaking effects, deduced from the $T^n$ temperature dependence of the London penetration depth below $T_c/3$. Moreover they claim that their results are also ruling out the suggestion that surface conditions can significantly affect the TDO data but this conclusion is based on one very specific damaging process, and is completely ignoring the large dispersion in the previously published TDO data.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.