Paper detail

Comment on "Physical Origin and Generic Control of Magnonic Band Gaps of Dipole-Exchange Spin Waves in Width-Modulated Nanostrip Waveguides" [K.-S. Lee, D.-S. Han, and S.-K. Kim, PRL 102, 127202 (2009), arXiv:0811.0411]

In Ref. [PRL 102, 127202 (2009)] Lee et al. reported the existence of large magnonic bandgaps in one-dimensional width-modulated Permalloy nanostripe waveguides based on OOMMF simulations. However, as the symmetry of the magnetic field pulse they applied to excite the spin waves (SWs) was not general, the entire set of SW branches with A symmetry was omitted from the magnonic band structures (see below). This omission has unfortunately led to misleading conclusions of, for instance, the number, width and position of the bandgaps. We present here the full band structure based on three different theoretical approaches that gave consistent predictions, thus corroborating the methods employed, namely, a microscopic approach, OOMMF simulations, and a method based on the linearized Landau-Lifshitz equation. Further, we provide a physical interpretation using group theory.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.