Paper detail

Comment on "Pentadiamond: A Hard Carbon Allotrope of a Pentagonal Network of sp2 and sp3 C Atoms"

In a recent Letter, Fujii et. al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 016001] predicted a new carbon allotrope, pentadiamond, with remarkable mechanical properties: elastic moduli comparable or larger than diamond, and negative Poisson's ratio $μ$ = -0.241. The estimated Vicker's hardness is 422 GPa, $\sim$4.6 times higher than in diamond($\sim$92 GPa), the hardest material known to date. Pentadiamond, however was not investigated. Motivated by this, we used different approaches to estimate the elastic properties of pentadiamond with different approximations based on Density Functional Theory. The tests were also carried out on diamond and other known hard carbon allotropes for validation. Through tests, we found that the elastic constants and elastic moduli of pentadiamond reported in Ref. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 016001] are incorrect, and pentadiamond should be considered a non-auxetic soft carbon allotrope.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.