Paper detail

Comment on "Noncommutative gauge theories and Lorentz symmetry, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 125004 (2004) by R.Banerjee, B.Chakraborty and K.Kumar"

We show that Lorentz symmetry is generally absent for noncommutative (abelian) gauge theories and obtain a compact formula for the divergence of the Noether currents that allows a throughout study of this instance of symmetry violation. We use that formula to explain why the results of "Noncommutative gauge theories and Lorentz symmetry", Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 125004 (2004) by R.Banerjee, B.Chakraborty and K.Kumar, interpreted there as new criteria for Lorentz {\it invariance}, are in fact just a particular case of the general expression for Lorentz {\it violation} obtained here. Finally, it is suggested that the divergence-formula should hold in a vast class of cases, such as, for instance, the Standard Model Extension.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.