Paper detail

Comment on "Galilean invariance at quantum Hall edge"

In a recent paper by S. Moroz, C. Hoyos, and L. Radzihovsky [Phys. Rev. B 91, 195409 (2015)], it is claimed that the conductivity at low frequency $ω$ and small wavevector $q$ along the edge of a quantum Hall (QH) system (that possesses Galilean invariance along the edge) contains a universal contribution of order $q^2$ that is determined by the orbital spin per particle in the bulk of the system, or alternatively by the shift of the ground state. (These quantities are known to be related to the Hall viscosity of the bulk.) In this Comment we calculate the real part of the conductivity, integrated over $ω$, in this regime for the edge of a system of non-interacting electrons filling either the lowest, or the lowest $ν$ ($ν=1$, $2$, . . .), Landau level(s), and show that the $q^2$ term is non-universal and depends on details of the confining potential at the edge. In the special case of a linear potential, a form similar to the prediction is obtained, it is possible that this corrected form of the prediction may also hold for fractional QH states in systems with special forms of interactions between electrons.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.