Paper detail

Comment on "Combined experimental and computational study of the recrystallization process induced by electronic interactions of swift heavy ions with silicon carbide crystals"

A combined experimental and computational study of the recrystallization process induced by swift heavy ions in pre-damaged silicon carbide crystals was reported in a recent paper by Debelle et al. [Phys. Rev. B 86, 100102(R) (2012)]. In this study, the authors tried to mimic by means of molecular dynamic simulations both damage production induced by low energy ion irradiation in SiC and the recrystallization effect generated by subsequent swift heavy ion irradiation. Here we show that the simulations performed by the authors are far from being realistic and cannot reproduce, even qualitatively, the experimental results. In fact, in their simulation of damage production, amorphization is reached at an amount of deposited energy per target atom ($\sim$5.4 eV/atom) which is nearly 5 times less than what is found in previous experimental and computational studies, whereas for the simulation of the recrystallization process, the recrystallization rate per incident ion is about 40 times higher than the experimental value. Because of these extremely huge discrepancies, these molecular dynamic calculations are completely erroneous and the authors cannot claim that they found an "exceptionally good agreement between experiments and simulations" and that "the recovery process is unambiguously accounted for by the thermal spike phenomenon". In addition, no mention is given about a very similar experimental study recently published by some of the authors but with a quite different result for the case of fully amorphous SiC.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.