Paper detail

Comfort-driven mobility produces spatial fragmentation in Axelrod's model

Axelrod's model for the dissemination of culture combines two key ingredients of social dynamics: social influence, through which people become more similar when they interact, and homophily, which is the tendency of individuals to interact preferentially with similar others. In Axelrod's model, the agents are fixed to the nodes of a network and are allowed to interact with a predetermined set of peers only, resulting in the frustration of a large number of agents that end up culturally isolated. Here we modify this model by allowing the agents to move away from their cultural opposites and stay put when near their cultural likes. The comfort, i.e., the tendency of an agent to stay put in a neighborhood, is determined by the cultural similarity with its neighbors. The less the comfort, the higher the odds that the agents will move apart a fixed step size. We find that the comfort-driven mobility fragments severely the influence network for low initial cultural diversity, resulting in a network composed of only microscopic components in the thermodynamic limit. For high initial cultural diversity and intermediate values of the step size, we find that a macroscopic component coexists with the microscopic ones. The transition between these two fragmentation regimes changes from continuous to discontinuous as the step size increases. In addition, we find that for both very small and very large step sizes the influence network is severely fragmented.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.