Paper detail

Comet C/2011 J2 (Linear): Fragmentation and physical properties of the two nuclei

Comet C2011 J2 (Linear), was discovered to the Catalina Sky Survey Observatory, based on University of Arizona. Is an hyperbolic comet passed to the perihelion at T 2013 Dec. 25.4020 TT. The distance q from the Sun is 3.443732 A.U., that mean that dont never cross the snow line. Also, the Sun gravitational force is not such to determine a strong stress on the cometary nucleus. A possible fragmentation at that distance from the Sun in general, is unlikely, but on 2014 September 19th, the CBAT 3979 by D. Green of the ICQ, report the discoveries of a fragment companion of the comet main body. In the following days others observers confirms the presence of the secondary body. (F. Manzini et al. September 2014, IAU CBET 3986, 2014 September 24th) In the observation of the comet on 2014 September 28, using a 25 cm Newton and CCD with R photometric filter, I detect the secondary body and assuming as possible scenario the presence of a solid fragment in the cloud of material of the fragmentation, I measured some physical parameters, the magnitude in R band and Af(rho) value of the two nuclei. Here are presented the preliminaries data.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.