Paper detail

Combining the baryon budget with CMBR measurements

Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) provide a powerful tool for measuring the primary cosmological parameters. However, there is a large degree of parameter degeneracy in simultaneous measurements of the matter density, Omega_m, and the Hubble parameter, H_0. In the present paper we use the presently available CMBR data together with measurements of the cosmological baryon-to-photon ratio, eta, from Big Bang nucleosynthesis, and the relative mass fraction of baryons in clusters to break the parameter degeneracy in measuring Omega_m and H_0. We find that present data is inconsistent with the standard Omega=1, matter dominated model. Our analysis favours a medium density universe with a rather low Hubble parameter. This is compatible with new measurements of type Ia supernovae, and the joint estimate of the two parameters is Omega_m = 0.45^{+0.07}_{-0.07} and H_0 = 39^{+14}_{-13} km s^-1 Mpc^-1. We stress that the upper bound on the Hubble parameter is likely to be much more uncertain than indicated here, because of the limited number of free parameters in our analysis.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.