Paper detail

Combined Extended Rejoinder to "Extended Comment on "One-Range Addition Theorems for Coulomb Interaction Potential and Its Derivatives" by I. I. Guseinov (Chem. Phys., Vol. 309 (2005), pp. 209-213)"

This article is a thorough critique to the Weniger's comments made to our papers published in prestigious journals in the recent years. A detailed and critical examination of the arguments that led to the suggested comment by Weniger reveals some serious flaws. In our published papers we have shown that the unsymmetrical and symmetrical one-range addition theorems for Slater type orbitals, Coulomb-Yukawa like correlated interaction potentials (CIPs) and their derivatives are derived from the expansions in terms of -ETOs that are complete and orthonormal sets of exponential type orbitals in corresponding Hilbert spaces, where The concrete criticism raised in Weniger's comment against our papers actually touches a very minor aspect of the works that are not relevant at all for the conclusions, which are made. As can be seen from our papers, all of the formulas for different kinds of multicenter integrals over Slater type orbitals with integer and noninteger principal quantum numbers obtained by the use of unsymmetrical and symmetrical one-range addition theorems were tested by computer calculations. We reject the Weniger's personal views about papers published by Guseinov and his coworkers from 1978 to 2006 and respectable referees on one-range addition theorems and multicenter integrals. All claims of inconsistencies and flaws in the theoretical framework are rejected as unfounded. This rejoinder paper contains all of the answers to Weniger's comments.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.