Paper detail

Combined explanations of $(g-2)_μ$, $R_{D^{(\ast)}}$, $R_{K^{(\ast)}}$ anomalies in a two-loop radiative neutrino mass model

Motivated by the long-standing tension in the muon anomalous magnetic moment (AMM) and persistent observations of B-physics anomalies in $R_{D^{(\ast)}}$ and $R_{K^{(\ast)}}$ ratios, we construct a simple two-loop radiative neutrino mass model, and propose a combined explanations of all these apparently disjoint phenomena within this framework. Our proposed model consists of two scalar leptoquarks (LQs), a $SU(2)_L$ singlet $S_1\sim (\overline{3},1,1/3)$ and a $SU(2)_L$ triplet $S_3\sim (\overline{3},3,1/3)$ to accommodate $R_{D^{(\ast)}}$ and $R_{K^{(\ast)}}$ anomalies, respectively. The muon receives chirality-enhanced contribution towards its $g-2$ due to the presence of $S_1$ LQ that accounts for the observed deviation from the Standard Model prediction. Furthermore, we introduce a $SU(2)_L$ singlet scalar diquark $ω\sim (\overline{6},1,2/3)$, which is necessary to break lepton number and generate neutrino mass radiatively with the aid of $S_1$ and $S_3$ LQs. We perform a detailed phenomenological analysis of this set-up and demonstrate its viability by providing benchmark points where a fit to the neutrino oscillation data together with proper explanations of the muon AMM puzzle and flavor anomalies are accomplished while simultaneously meeting all other flavor violation and collider bounds.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.