Paper detail

Combined effects of fluid type and particle shape on particles flow in microfluidic platforms

Recent numerical analyses to optimize the design of microfluidic devices for more effective entrapment or segregation of surrogate circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from healthy cells have been reported in the literature without concurrently accommodating the non-Newtonian nature of the body fluid and the non-uniform geometric shapes of the CTCs. Through a series of two-dimensional proof-of-concept simulations with increased levels of complexity (e.g., number of particles, inline obstacles), we investigated the validity of the assumptions of the Newtonian fluid behavior for pseudoplastic fluids and the circular particle shape for different-shaped particles (DSPs) in the context of microfluidics-facilitated shape-based segregation of particles. Simulations with a single DSP revealed that even in the absence of internal geometric complexities of a microfluidics channel, the aforementioned assumptions led to 0.11-0.21W (W is the channel length) errors in lateral displacements of DSPs, up to 3-20% errors in their velocities, and 3-5% errors in their travel times. When these assumptions were applied in simulations involving multiple DSPs in inertial microfluidics with inline obstacles, errors in the lateral displacements of DSPs were as high as 0.78W and in their travel times up to 23%, which led to different (un)symmetric flow and segregation patterns of DSPs. Thus, the fluid type and particle shape should be included in numerical models and experiments to assess the performance of microfluidics for targeted cell (e.g., CTCs) harvesting.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.