Paper detail

Combinatorics via Closed Orbits: Number Theoretic Ramanujan Graphs are not Unique Neighbor Expanders

The question of finding expander graphs with strong vertex expansion properties such as unique neighbor expansion and lossless expansion is central to computer science. A barrier to constructing these is that strong notions of expansion could not be proven via the spectral expansion paradigm. A very symmetric and structured family of optimal spectral expanders (i.e., Ramanujan graphs) was constructed using number theory by Lubotzky, Phillips and Sarnak, and was subsequently generalized by others. We call such graphs Number Theoretic Ramanujan Graphs. These graphs are not only spectrally optimal, but also posses strong symmetries and rich structure. Thus, it has been widely conjectured that number theoretic Ramanujan graphs are lossless expanders, or at least unique neighbor expanders. In this work we disprove this conjecture, by showing that there are number theoretic Ramanujan graphs that are not even unique neighbor expanders. This is done by introducing a new combinatorial paradigm that we term the closed orbit method. The closed orbit method allows one to construct finite combinatorial objects with extermal substructures. This is done by observing that there exist infinite combinatorial structures with extermal substructures, coming from an action of a subgroup of the automorphism group of the structure. The crux of our idea is a systematic way to construct a finite quotient of the infinite structure containing a simple shadow of the infinite substructure, which maintains its extermal combinatorial property. Other applications of the method are to the edge expansion of number theoretic Ramanujan graphs and vertex expansion of Ramanujan complexes. Finally, in the field of graph quantum ergodicity we produce number theoretic Ramanujan graphs with an eigenfunction of small support that corresponds to the zero eigenvalue. This again contradicts common expectations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.