Paper detail

Combinatorics of the zeta map on rational Dyck paths

An $(a,b)$-Dyck path $P$ is a lattice path from $(0,0)$ to $(b,a)$ that stays above the line $y=\frac{a}{b}x$. The zeta map is a curious rule that maps the set of $(a,b)$-Dyck paths into itself; it is conjecturally bijective, and we provide progress towards proof of bijectivity in this paper, by showing that knowing zeta of $P$ and zeta of $¶$ conjugate is enough to recover $P$. Our method begets an area-preserving involution $χ$ on the set of $(a,b)$-Dyck paths when $ζ$ is a bijection, as well as a new method for calculating $ζ^{-1}$ on classical Dyck paths. For certain nice $(a,b)$-Dyck paths we give an explicit formula for $ζ^{-1}$ and $χ$ and for additional $(a,b)$-Dyck paths we discuss how to compute $ζ^{-1}$ and $χ$ inductively. We also explore Armstrong's skew length statistic and present two new combinatorial methods for calculating the zeta map involving lasers and interval intersections. We provide a combinatorial statistic $δ$ that can be used to recursively compute $ζ^{-1}$ and show that $δ$ is computable from $ζ(P)$ in the Fuss-Catalan case.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.