Paper detail

Combinatorics of a disordered two-species ASEP on a torus

We define a new disordered asymmetric simple exclusion process (ASEP) with two species of particles, first-class particles labelled $\bullet$ and second-class particles labelled ${\scriptstyle \Box}$, on a two-dimensional toroidal lattice. The dynamics is controlled by particles labelled $\bullet$, which only move horizontally, with forward and backward hopping rates $p_i$ and $q_i$ respectively if the $\bullet$ is on row $i$. The motion of particles labelled ${\scriptstyle \Box}$ depends on the relative position of these with respect to $\bullet$'s, and can be both horizontal and vertical. We show that the stationary weight of any configuration is proportional to a monomial in the $p_i$'s and $q_i$'s. Our process projects to the disordered ASEP on a ring, and so explains combinatorially the stationary distribution of the latter first derived by Evans (Europhysics Letters, 1996). We compute the partition function, as well as densities and currents of $\bullet$'s and ${\scriptstyle \Box}$'s in the stationary state. We observe a novel mechanism we call the Scott Russell phenomenon: the current of ${\scriptstyle \Box}$'s in the vertical direction is the same as that of $\bullet$'s in the horizontal direction.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.