Paper detail

Combinatorial Redundancy Detection

The problem of detecting and removing redundant constraints is fundamental in optimization. We focus on the case of linear programs (LPs) in dictionary form, given by $n$ equality constraints in $n+d$ variables, where the variables are constrained to be nonnegative. A variable $x_r$ is called redundant, if after removing $x_r \geq 0$ the LP still has the same feasible region. The time needed to solve such an LP is denoted by $LP(n,d)$. It is easy to see that solving $n+d$ LPs of the above size is sufficient to detect all redundancies. The currently fastest practical method is the one by Clarkson: it solves $n+d$ linear programs, but each of them has at most $s$ variables, where $s$ is the number of nonredundant constraints. In the first part we show that knowing all of the finitely many dictionaries of the LP is sufficient for the purpose of redundancy detection. A dictionary is a matrix that can be thought of as an enriched encoding of a vertex in the LP. Moreover - and this is the combinatorial aspect - it is enough to know only the signs of the entries, the actual values do not matter. Concretely we show that for any variable $x_r$ one can find a dictionary, such that its sign pattern is either a redundancy or nonredundancy certificate for $x_r$. In the second part we show that considering only the sign patterns of the dictionary, there is an output sensitive algorithm of running time $\mathcal{O}(d \cdot (n+d) \cdot s^{d-1} \cdot LP(s,d) + d \cdot s^{d} \cdot LP(n,d))$ to detect all redundancies. In the case where all constraints are in general position, the running time is $\mathcal{O}(s \cdot LP(n,d) + (n+d) \cdot LP(s,d))$, which is essentially the running time of the Clarkson method. Our algorithm extends naturally to a more general setting of arrangements of oriented topological hyperplane arrangements.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.