Combinatorial dichotomies and cardinal invariants

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Abstract

Assuming the P-ideal dichotomy, we attempt to isolate those cardinal characteristics of the continuum that are correlated with two well-known consequences of the proper forcing axiom. We find a cardinal invariant x\mathfrak{x} such that the statement that x>ω1\mathfrak{x} > ω_{1} is equivalent to the statement that 1, ωω, ω1ω_{1}, ω×ω1ω\times ω_{1}, and [ω1]<ω{\left[ω_{1}\right]}^{< ω} are the only cofinal types of directed sets of size at most ℵ1{\aleph}_{1}. We investigate the corresponding problem for the partition relation ω1→(ω1,α)2ω_{1} \rightarrow (ω_{1}, α)^2 for all α<ω1α< ω_{1}. To this effect, we investigate partition relations for pairs of comparable elements of a coherent Suslin tree S\mathbb{S}. We show that a positive partition relation for such pairs follows from the maximal amount of the proper forcing axiom compatible with the existence of S\mathbb{S}. As a consequence we conclude that after forcing with the coherent Suslin tree S\mathbb{S} over a ground model satisfying this relativization of the proper forcing axiom, ω1 →(ω1,α)2ω_{1} ~\rightarrow {(ω_{1}, α)}^{2} for all α<ω1α< ω_{1}. We prove that this positive partition relation for S\mathbb{S} cannot be improved by showing in ZFC\mathrm{ZFC} that S↛(ℵ1,ω+2)2\mathbb{S} \not\rightarrow ({\aleph}_{1}, ω+2)^2.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.