Paper detail

Combinatorial dichotomies and cardinal invariants

Assuming the P-ideal dichotomy, we attempt to isolate those cardinal characteristics of the continuum that are correlated with two well-known consequences of the proper forcing axiom. We find a cardinal invariant $\mathfrak{x}$ such that the statement that $\mathfrak{x} > ω_{1}$ is equivalent to the statement that 1, $ω$, $ω_{1}$, $ω\times ω_{1}$, and ${\left[ω_{1}\right]}^{< ω}$ are the only cofinal types of directed sets of size at most ${\aleph}_{1}$. We investigate the corresponding problem for the partition relation $ω_{1} \rightarrow (ω_{1}, α)^2$ for all $α< ω_{1}$. To this effect, we investigate partition relations for pairs of comparable elements of a coherent Suslin tree $\mathbb{S}$. We show that a positive partition relation for such pairs follows from the maximal amount of the proper forcing axiom compatible with the existence of $\mathbb{S}$. As a consequence we conclude that after forcing with the coherent Suslin tree $\mathbb{S}$ over a ground model satisfying this relativization of the proper forcing axiom, $ω_{1} ~\rightarrow {(ω_{1}, α)}^{2}$ for all $α< ω_{1}$. We prove that this positive partition relation for $\mathbb{S}$ cannot be improved by showing in $\mathrm{ZFC}$ that $\mathbb{S} \not\rightarrow ({\aleph}_{1}, ω+2)^2$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.