Paper detail

Combating Corrupt Messages in Sparse Clustered Associative Memories

In this paper we analyze and extend the neural network based associative memory proposed by Gripon and Berrou. This associative memory resembles the celebrated Willshaw model with an added partite cluster structure. In the literature, two retrieving schemes have been proposed for the network dynamics, namely sum-of-sum and sum-of-max. They both offer considerably better performance than Willshaw and Hopfield networks, when comparable retrieval scenarios are considered. Former discussions and experiments concentrate on the erasure scenario, where a partial message is used as a probe to the network, in the hope of retrieving the full message. In this regard, sum-of-max outperforms sum-of-sum in terms of retrieval rate by a large margin. However, we observe that when noise and errors are present and the network is queried by a corrupt probe, sum-of-max faces a severe limitation as its stringent activation rule prevents a neuron from reviving back into play once deactivated. In this manuscript, we categorize and analyze different error scenarios so that both the erasure and the corrupt scenarios can be treated consistently. We make an amendment to the network structure to improve the retrieval rate, at the cost of an extra scalar per neuron. Afterwards, five different approaches are proposed to deal with corrupt probes. As a result, we extend the network capability, and also increase the robustness of the retrieving procedure. We then experimentally compare all these proposals and discuss pros and cons of each approach under different types of errors. Simulation results show that if carefully designed, the network is able to preserve both a high retrieval rate and a low running time simultaneously, even when queried by a corrupt probe.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.